hd1

The problem of man and world order in the works of E. Vodolazkin (‘Laurus’) and V. Pelevin (‘iPhuck 10’)

  • PDF
  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.37816/2073‑9567‑2026‑79‑158‑168
  • УДК / UDC: 821.161.1.0
  • Publication Type: Research Article
  • For Citation:

    Krotova, D.V. “The Problem of Man and World Order in the Works of E. Vodolazkin (‘Laurus’) and V. Pelevin (‘iPhuck 10’).” Vestnik slavianskikh kul’tur, vol. 79, 2026, pp. 158–168. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.37816/2073‑9567‑2026‑79‑158‑168 
  • Author 1: Daria V. Krotova
  • Information about the Author 1:

    Daria V. Krotova — DSc in Philology, Docent, Associate Professor, Department of the History of Modern Russian Literature and the Contemporary Literary Process, Philological Faculty, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Leninskie Gory, 1, 119991 Moscow, Russia.

    ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000‑0002‑6804‑1605

    E‑mail: da‑This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. 
  • Abstract: Novels “Laurus” by E. Vodolazkin and “iPhuck 10” by V. Pelevin embody contrasting trends in modern literary process. The opposition of these works is traced according to a number of parameters. Among the most important is the opposition “the world of authenticity — the world of simulation”: while “Laurus” is based on the idea of sincerity of faith, authenticity of feeling, the artistic space of «iPhuck 10» is founded on total simulation. The “Laurus” reflects the idea of uniqueness of the personality, in Pelevin’s novel the personality can be generated artificially, by means of high tech‑ nologies. The approach of Vodolazkin and Pelevin in the analyzed novels towards the issue of posthumous existence of a person is radically different: whereas the author of “Laurus” reflects on this problem in terms of Christian teaching, in Pelevin’s universe the patterns of person’s consciousness after the physical death are transferred to the virtual plane. In Vodolazkin’s novel the idea of God plays key role, in Pelevin’s work artificial intelligence claims to take the place of God. But according to Pelevin, artificial intelligence will never surpass a person in determination to be. Vodolazkin and Pelevin paradoxically converge in understanding the deep foundations of a person`s existence.
  • Keywords: Russian literature, contemporary literature, Vodolazkin, Pelevin, “Laurus”, “iPhuck 10”, Christian worldview, the virtual world in literature, artificial intelligence.
  • Страницы / Pages: 158–168
  • Received: January 11, 2025
  • Approved after Reviewing: November 17, 2025
  • Publication Date: March 25, 2026

  • 1 Arkhangel'skaia, A.V. “Vremia drevnerusskoe i sovremennoe v romane Evgeniia Vodolazkina ‘Lavr’” [“Old Russian and Modern Time in the Novel by Evgeniy Vodolazkin ‘Laurus’”]. Materialy nauchnoi konferentsii «Lomonosovskie chteniia» 2013 goda i Mezhdunarodnoi nauchnoi konferentsii studentov, aspirantov i molodykh uchenykh «Lomonosov-2013» [Materials of the Scientific conference “Lomonosov Readings” of 2013 and the International Scientific Conference of Students, Graduate Students and Young Scientists “Lomonosov-2013”], ed. M.E. Sokolova, G.A. Golubeva, V.A. Ivanova, N.N. Milenko, V.V. Khapaeva. Sevastopol, Ekspress‑pechat’ Publ., 2013, pp. 113–114. (In Russ.)

    2 Arkhangel'skaia, A.V. “Pravedniki i pravednichestvo v romanakh Evgeniia Vodolazkina ‘Lavr’ i ‘Opravdanie Ostrova’” [“Righteous Men and Righteousness in E.G. Vodolazkin’s Novels ‘Laurus’ and ‘Justification of the Island’”]. Uchenye zapiski Novgorodskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, no. 1 (40), 2022, pp. 88–91. https://doi.org/10.34680/2411‑7951.2022.1(40).88‑91 (In Russ.)

    3 Bochkina, M.V. “Otrazhenie srednevekovoi kontseptsii vremeni v romanakh E. Vodolazkina ‘Lavr’ i ‘Aviator’” [“Medieval Concept of Time Reflection in E. Vodolazkin’s Novels ‘Laurus’ and ‘The Aviator’”]. Vestnik Rossiiskogo universiteta druzhby narodov. Series: Literaturovedenie. Zhurnalistika [Literary Studies. Journalism], vol. 22, no. 3, 2017, pp. 475–483. https://doi.org/10.22363/2312‑9220‑2017‑22‑3‑475‑483 (In Russ.)

    4 Bratus’, B.S. “Anomalii lichnosti” [“Anomalies of Personality”]. LitLaif. Moscow, Mysl’Publ., 1988. 304 p. Available at: https://litlife.club/books/209044/read (Accessed 09 November 2025). (In Russ.)

    5 Derrida, Zh. O grammatologii [Of Grammatology]. Moscow, Ad Marginem Publ., 2000. 511 р. (In Russ.)

    6 Zalomkina, G.V. “Kserokopiia sveta: vzgliad na utopiiu iskusstvennogo v romanakh V. Pelevina ‘iPhuck 10’ i ‘S.N.U.F.F.’” [“A Photocopy of Light: a View of the Utopia of Artificiality in V. Pelevin’s Novels ‘S.N.U.F.F.’ and ‘iPhuck 10’”]. Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie, no. 3 (163), 2020, pp. 194–210 (In Russ.)

    7 Kovalenko, A.G. Ocherki khudozhestvennoi konfliktologii: Antinomizm i binarnyi arkhetip v russkoi literature ХХ veka. [Essays on Artistic Conflictology. Antinomism and Binary Archetype in Russian Literature of the 20th Century]. Moscow, Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia Publ., 2010. 491 p. (In Russ.)

    8 Krotova, D.V. Sovremennaia russkaia literatura. Postmodernizm i neomodernizm. [Modern Russian Literature. Post-modern and “New-modern”]. Moscow, MAKS Press Publ., 2018. 224 p. (In Russ.)

    9 Leonov, V.А. “Osnovy pravoslavnoi antropologii” [“Fundamentals of Orthodox anthropology”], 2nd ed. Moscow, Moskovskaia patriarkhiia Russkoi pravoslavnoi tserkvi Publ., 2016. 456 p. Pravoslavnyi portal «Azbuka very» [The Orthodox Portal “ABC of Faith”]. Available at: https://azbyka.ru/otechnik/Vadim_Leonov/voprosy‑pravoslavnoj‑antropologii/#source (In Russ.) (Accessed 09 November 2025).

    10 Maglii, A.D. “Zhanrovoe svoeobrazie romana E. Vodolazkina ‘Lavr’” [“Genre Specifics of E. Vodolazkin’s Novel ‘Laurus’”]. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Series 9: Filologiia [Philology], no. 1, 2015, pp. 177–186. (In Russ.)

    11 Makhinina, N.G., Sidorova, M.M. “Istoricheskoe vremia v romane E. Vodolazkina ‘Lavr’ (k postanovke problemy)” [“Historical Time in EVodolazkin's Novel ‘Laurus’ (to Statement of a Problem)”]. Filologiia i kul’tura / Philology and Culture, no. 2 (44), 2016, pp. 271–274. (In Russ.)

    12 Migalina, D.A. “Dialektika zhizni i smerti v romane E. Vodolazkina ‘Lavr’” [“The Dialectic of Life and Death in ‘Laurus’ by Eugene Vodolazkin”]. 1920-e i 2020-e: vzgliad skvoz’ stoletie. Materialy XXVI Sheshukovskikh chtenii [The 1920s and the 2020s: a Look Across a Century. Proceedings of the 26th Sheshukov Readings]. Moscow, Moscow Pedagogical State University Publ., 2022, pp. 135–141. (In Russ.)

    13 Soldatkina, Ia.V. “Dialog s russkoi literaturoi ХХ veka v romanakh Evgeniia Vodol‑azkina ‘Lavr’ i ‘Aviator’” [“The Dialogue with Russian Literature of the 20th Century in Evgeny Vodolazkin’s Novels ‘Laurus’ and ‘The Aviator’”]. Znakovye imena sovremennoi russkoi literatury. Evgenii Vodolazkin [The Iconic Names of Modern Russian Literature. Evgene Vodolazkin], ed. by A. Skotnitskoi, Ia. Svezhego. Krakov, Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego Publ., 2019, pp. 309–318. (In Russ.)

    14 Trofimova, N.V. “Traditsii drevnerusskoi literatury v romane E.G. Vodolazkina ‘Lavr’” [“Traditions of Old Russian Literature in the Novel ‘Laurus’ by E.G. Vodolazkin”]. RHEMA / REMA, no. 2, 2016, pp. 7–20. (In Russ.)

    15 Iuzefovich, G.L. “‘iPhuck 10’: luchshii roman Viktora Pelevina za desiat’ let” [“‘iPhuck 10’: the Best Novel by Victor Pelevin in Ten Years”]. Knizhnyi servis «LiveLib» [Book Service “LiveLib”], 26 September, 2017. Available at: https://www.livelib.ru/news/post/30049‑galina‑yuzefovich‑iphuck‑10‑luchshij‑roman‑viktora‑pelevina‑za‑desyat‑let (Accessed 24 March 2024). (In Russ.)

    16 Ian’, Meipin. “Etika i gumanizm iskusstvennogo intellekta (na materiale romana V. Pelevina ‘IPhuck 10’)” [“Ethics and Humanism of Artificial Intelligence (by the Material of Victor Pelevin’s Novel ‘iPhuck 10’”]. Filologicheskie nauki. Voprosy teorii i praktiki, vol. 13, iss. 7, 2020, pp. 58–63. https://doi.org/10.30853/filnauki.2020.7.11 (In Russ.)

Current Issue