Title of the article: |
ANTIQUITY DISCOURSE IN POSTMODERN MASS CULTURE AND METHODS OF ITS INTERPRETATION |
Author(s): |
Oxana A. Zapeka Valentin S. Shovikov |
Information about the author/authors |
Oksana A. Zapeka — PhD in Philosophy, Professor, A. N. Kosygin Russian State University, Khibinsky pr., 6, 129337 Moscow, Russian. E-mail: zana5@yandex.ru Valentin S. Novikov — graduate of The State Academy of Slavic Сulture, Khibinsky pr., 6, 129337 Moscow, Russian. E-mail: valentin.shovikov@gmail.com |
Section |
Theory and history of culture |
Year |
2018 |
Volume |
Vol. 49 |
Pages |
Рp. 122–134 |
Received |
March 14, 2018 |
Date of publication |
September 15, 2018 |
Index UDK |
008 |
Index BBK |
71.1 |
Abstract |
Antiquity discourse represents dynamic structure under constant shaping and what is more, being individual for each person. However we are able to highlight basic tendencies in what how antic heritage gets its interpreting within modern mass culture. Since 90-s of the past century everyday culture comes to the forefront of the popular science agenda. We are witnessing the shift of interest from global meaning-making discourses of Antiquity towards their fragmental (discrete) manifestations. Drawing on the classical heritage, writers and directors, unconsciously as it may be, chose those fields that fit the modern conscience discourse the most. The paper brings to notice that postmodern mistrust towards “metanarratives” affects the selection of actual antique images and topics for mass culture. This postmodern feature impacts on the subject matter of interpreting the classical heritage as well. Clearly visible tendency linked to the nature of interpretation of Antiquity in postmodern mass culture — is a psychologization and physiologization of the narration. In the pursuit of more realistic portrayal of the way of life of Ancient Greece and Roman Empire architects of modern mass culture deconstruct original artifacts of Antiquity while reconstructing the discourse of Antiquity of the postmodern era, reflecting within it most typical features of the modern conscience. Characters and mythological creatures acquire complexes, while social medium or psychological motivation determine their words and deeds. |
Keywords |
postmodernism, classical heritage, discourse, meta-text, mass culture, everyday culture, interpretation, artifact, psychologization, physiologization, crisis. |
References |
1 Bobrovnikova T. A. Povsednevnaia zhizn' rimskogo patritsiia v epokhu razrusheniia Karfagena [Everyday life of the Roman patrician in the era of destruction of Carthage]. Moscow, Molodaia gvardiia Publ., 2001. 496 p. (In Russian) 2 Burevoi R. Taina Nereidy [The Mystery of the Nereids]. St. Petersburg, Astrel'-SPb Publ., 2005. 582 p. (In Russian) 3 Burevoi R. Vse dorogi vedut v Rim [All roads lead to Rome]. St. Petersburg, Astrel'-SPb Publ., 2005. 526 p. (In Russian) 4 Burevoi R. Severnaia Pal'mira [Northern Palmyra]. Moscow, AST Publ., 2005. 514 p. (In Russian) 5 Burevoi R. Bogi slepnut [Gods are blind]. Moscow, AST Publ., 2005. 512 p. (In Russian) 6 Velishskii F. Istoriia tsivilizatsii: Byt i nravy drevnikh grekov i rimlian [History of civilization: Life and customs of the ancient Greeks and Romans]. Moscow, EKSMO-Press Publ., 2000. 704 p. (In Russian) 7 Vershinin L. Nasledniki boga [Heirs of God]. St. Petersburg, Azbuka-klassika Publ., 2006. Book 1. 412 p. (In Russian) 8 Dzhons T., Ereira A. Varvary [Barbarians]. Moscow, Stolitsa-print Publ., 2007. 488 p. (In Russian) 9 Zhizhek S. Istinno levyi Gollivud [Truly Left Hollywood]. Skepsis [Skepticism]. Available at: http://scepsis.ru/library/id_1587.html (accessed 10 March 2018). (In Russian) 10 Zorich A. Rimskaia zvezda [Roman star]. Moscow, Izd-vo AST Publ., 2007. 325 p. (In Russian) 11 Il'mova Iu. A. “Igra v antichnost'” v prostranstve sovremennoi massovoi kul'tury [“Playing in antiquity” in the space of modern mass culture]. Iaroslavskii pedagogicheskii vestnik, 2015, no 6, pp. 324–332. (In Russian) 12 Kantor V. K. Tsivilizatsiia beskonechnykh usilii [Civilization of infinite efforts]. Ekspert, 2006, no 27, pp. 72–74. (In Russian) 13 Kin'iar P. Al'butsii [Albury]. St. Petersburg, Azbuka-klassika Publ., 2005. 236 p. (In Russian) 14 Liotar Zh.-F. Sostoianie postmoderna [The state of postmodern]. St. Petersburg, Aleteiia Publ., 1998. 160 p. (In Russian) 15 Mazin A. Varvary [Barbarians]. Moscow, AST Publ., 2007. 760 p. (In Russian) 16 Mazin A. Rimskii orel [The Roman eagle]. Moscow, AST Publ., 2007. 584 p. (In Russian) 17 Mazin A. Tsena Imperii [The Price of Empire]. Moscow, AST Publ., 2007. 528 p. (In Russian) 18 Mak-Dugl S. Grazhdane Rima [Citizens of Rome]. St. Petersburg, Amfora Publ., 2006. 141 p. (In Russian) 19 Makkaou K. Pesn' o Troe [The song of the Three]. Moscow, Eksmo Publ., 2009. 544 p. (In Russian) 20 Manfredi V. M. Poslednii legion [The Last Legion]. Moscow, AST Publ., 2005. 528 p. (In Russian) 21 Mil'chin K., Kucherskaia M. Kniga na vykhodnye [Book for the weekend]. Piatnitsa. Ezhenedel'noe prilozhenie k gazete Vedomosti, 2007, no 17 (54). (In Russian) 22 Panarin A. S. Iskushenie globalizmom [Temptation by globalism]. Moscow, Eksmo Publ., 2003. 416 p. (In Russian) 23 Reno Meri. Persidskii mal'chik [The Persian boy]. Moscow, Amfora Publ., 2005. 128 p. (In Russian) 24 Stepanov G. 300 spartantsev opiat' nasolili persam [300 Spartans again annoy the Persians]. Izvestiia, 2007, no 44, p. 16. (In Russian) |
PDF-file |
|
Illustrations |
|