|
Title of the article: |
CULTURAL POTENTIAL AS A SYMBOLIC BASIS OF THE MEMORIALIZATION OF HERITAGE OBJECTS IN THE SPACE OF A RUSSIAN INDUSTRIAL CITY (BY THE EXAMPLE OF THE CITY OF NOVOTROITSK, ORENBURG REGION) |
|
Author(s): |
Vladimir A. Rubin Ekaterina V. Spiridonova Maria L. Shub |
|
Information about the author/authors |
Vladimir A. Rubin — DSc in Culturology, PhD in History, Associate Professor, Expert of the Ministry of Culture of the Russian Federation, Associate Professor, Department of History of State and Law, Orenburg Institute (Branch), O. E. Kutafin Moscow State Law University, Komsomolskaya St. 50, 460654 Orenburg, Russia. Maria L. Shub — DSc in Culturology, Associate Professor, Professor, Department of Philosophy and Cultural Studies, Chelyabinsk State Institute of Culture, Ordzhonikidze St. 36a, 454091 Chelyabinsk, Russia. Ekaterina V. Spiridonova — PhD in Physics and Mathematics, Associate Professor, Department of Applied Mathematics, Orenburg State University, Pobedy Ave. 13, 460018 Orenburg, Russia. |
|
Section |
Theory and history of culture |
|
Year |
2023 |
|
Volume |
Vol. 68 |
|
Pages |
pp. 104–117 |
|
Received |
March 9, 2022 |
|
Approved after reviewing |
September 28, 2022 |
|
Date of publication |
June 28, 2023 |
|
DOI: |
https://doi.org/10.37816/2073-9567-2023-68-104-117 |
|
Index UDK |
130.2 |
|
Index BBK |
71.0 |
|
Acknowledgements |
The key provisions of the research were carried out within the grant program of the President of the Russian Federation for state support of young Russian scientists — doctors of sciences (MD-2020 Competition), the project “Culture of memory of industrial cities of the Russian province: memorial strategies of regional identity”. |
|
Abstract |
The relevance of this paper is related to the search for ways and effective methods to ensure the preservation of objects of material cultural heritage of Russia, which is confirmed by the adoption in 2020 of a new Article 67.1 of the Constitution of the Russian Federation on the protection of historical truth, continuity in the development of the Russian state during the millennial history, as well as the proclamation of 2022 — the Year of Cultural Heritage of the Peoples of Russia. The research`s aim is a comprehensive study of the cultural potential of the heritage object as a symbolic basis for its memorialization in the space of the Russian industrial city of the Soviet era. Taking into account the broad perspectives of the study of the phenomenon of “historical monument”, the authors consider the issue through the prism of value-normative, activity-based, symbolic and semiotic approaches to culture, concepts of historical memory and “places of memory”. Russian industrial cities have a unique culture, whose creators preserve and popularize the traditions of professional communities. In many of them, a historical and cultural landscape has been formed for a long time, indicating the possibility of identifying historical ensembles (industrial quarters, individual enterprises) and even entire historical settlements. However, this process requires a clear definition of the memorial value and is understudied so far. In this regard, the authors analyze the potential of cultural institutions of industrial centers that have accumulated solid socio-cultural experience as a basis for memorializing real estate objects, identifying new architectural monuments in the space of industrial centers of the Southern Urals. The study (state historical and cultural expertise) conducted in 2021 in relation to the Palace of Culture of Metallurgists in Novotroitsk, Orenburg region served as the paper`s empirical basis. The results obtained are implemented into the activities of the Orenburg region`s Government. The main results are to substantiate the expediency of using a broad methodological basis for the study of the cultural capital of a real estate object as a basis for its acceptance for state protection as a monument and to prove that cultural potential may act as a symbolic basis for the memorialization of a heritage object. |
|
Keywords |
Culture, Object of Cultural Heritage, Industrial City, Memorialization, Architectural Monument, Cultural Institution, Tradition, Industrial Heritage. |
|
References |
1 Baller, E. A. Sotsial'nyi progress i kul'turnoe nasledie [Social Progress and Cultural Heritage]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1987. 160 s. (In Russ.) 2 Galkova, O. V. “Kul'turnoe nasledie: sovremennye podkhody i problem” [“Cultural Heritage: Modern Approaches and Issues”]. Vestnik Moskovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta kul'tury i iskusstv, no. 6, 2008, pp. 43–46. (In Russ.) 3 Gurevich, P. S. Filosofskoe tolkovanie cheloveka [Philosophical Interpretation of Man]. Moscow, Tsentr gumanitarnykh initsiativ Publ., 2012. 472 s. (In Russ.) 4 Zamiatin, D. N. Kul'tura i prostranstvo: modelirovanie geograficheskikh obrazov [Culture and Space: Modeling of Geographical Images]. Moscow, Znak Publ., 2006. 488 p. (In Russ.) 5 Ikonnikova, S. N. Istoriia kul'turologicheskikh teorii [History of Cultural Theories]. St. Petersburg, Piter Publ., 2005. 474 p. (In Russ.) 6 Kaga n, M. S. Filosofiia kul'tury [Philosophy of Culture]. St. Petersburg: TOO TK “Petropolis” Publ., 1996. 416 p. (In Russ.) 7 Kogan, L. N., Vishnevskii, Iu. R., Shapko, V. T. Politicheskaia kul'tura razvitogo sotsializma: problemy i opyt [Political Culture of Developed Socialism: Problems and Experience]. Sverdlovsk, Sredne-ural'skoe knizhnoe izdatel'stvo Publ., 1982. 176 p. (In Russ.) 8 Kur'ianova, T. S. “Kul'turnoe nasledie: smyslovoe pole i praktika” [“Cultural Heritage: Semantic Field and Practice”]. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, no. 2, 2011, pp. 12–18. (In Russ.) 9 Lotman, Iu. M. Izbrannye stat'i: v 3 t. [Selected Articles: in 3 Vols.], vol. 1: Stat'i po semiotike i topologii kul'tury [Articles on Semiotics and Topology of Culture]. Tallin, Aleksandra Publ., 1992. 479 p. (In Russ.) 10 Markarian, E. S. Teoriia kul'tury i sovremennaia nauka. Logiko-metodologicheskii analiz [Theory of Culture and Modern Science. Logical and Methodological Analysis]. Moscow, Mysl' Publ., 1983. 284 p. (In Russ.) 11 Mezhuev, V. M. Kul'tura i istoriia [Culture and History]. Moscow, Politizdat Publ., 1977. 199 p. (In Russ.) 12 Tepliashin, A. A. Novotroitsk: gorod i liudi [Novotroitsk: City and People]. Ul'ianovsk, GUP “Oblastnaia tipografiia ‘Pechatnyi dvor’” Publ., 2004. 500 p. (In Russ.) 13 Uspenskii, B. A. Izbrannye trudy [Selected Works], vol. I: Semiotika istorii. Semiotika kul'tury [Semiotics of History. Semiotics of Culture]. Moscow, Shkola “Iazyki russkoi kul'tury” Publ., 1996. 608 p. (In Russ.) 14 Flier, A. Ia. “Kul'tura XXI veka: analiticheskii prognoz” [“Culture of the 21 Century: Analytical Forecast”]. Kul'turologiia i global'nye vyzovy sovremennosti: k razrabotke gumanisticheskoi ideologii samosokhraneniia chelovechestva: sbornik statei [Culturology and Global Challenges of Modernity: Towards the Development of a Humanistic Ideology of Self-preservation of Humankind: Collection of Papers]. St. Petersburg, Izdatel'stvo Sankt-Peterburgskogo kul'turologicheskogo obshchestva Publ., 2010, pp. 85–88. (In Russ.) 15 Flier, A. Ia. Kul'turologiia dlia kul'turologov: uchebn. posobie dlia magistrantov i aspirantov, doktorantov i soiskatelei, a takzhe prepodavatelei kul'turologii [Culturology for Culturologists: A Textbook for Undergraduates and Postgraduates, Doctoral Students and Applicants, as well as Teachers of Cultural Studies]. Moscow, Akademicheskii proekt Publ., 2000. 496 p. (In Russ.) 16 Frantsiia — pamiat' [France — Memory], P. Nora [and other]; trans. from France. St. Petersburg, Izdatel'stvo Sankt-Peterburgskogo institute Publ., 1999. 326 p. (In Russ.) 17 Shchedrovitskii, G. P. Izbrannye trudy [Selected works]. Moscow, Shkola kul'turnoi politiki Publ., 1995. 800 p. (In Russ.) |
|
PDF-file |
