Title of the article: |
PROLETARIAN vs SOVIET LITERATURE, (HOW THE PARTY DIRECTED LITERATURE) |
Author(s): |
Bystrova, O.V. |
Information about the author/authors |
Olga V. Bystrova, PhD in Philology, Senior Researcher, A.M. Gorky Institute of World Literature of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Povarskaya St. 25A, bld. 1, 121069 Moscow, Russia. |
Section |
Philological sciences |
Year |
2024 |
Volume |
Vol. 73 |
Pages |
pp. 182–195 |
Received |
February 08, 2024 |
Approved after reviewing |
February 16, 2024 |
Date of publication |
September 25, 2024 |
DOI: |
https://doi.org/10.37816/2073-9567-2024-73-182-195 |
Index UDK |
821.161.1 |
Index BBK |
83.3 |
Acknowledgements |
The study was supported by the Russian National Science Foundation Grant No. 20‑18‑00394 “Politics and Literature. Digital archive of literary organizations of the 1920s and 1930s.’ Available at: https://rscf.ru/project/20‑18‑00394/. |
Abstract |
The paper analyzes the process of formation and introduction into practice of party control over the literary process. The correlation/opposition of the terms “proletarian literature” and “Soviet literature” in the first decade of Soviet power is considered through the prism of increasing party influence on society. The first manifestation of party control is the decree “On Proletkult” (1920), after which the organization entered the structure of the People’s Commissariat of Education. Adopted in 1925, the resolution “On the party’s policy in the field of fiction” clearly pointed to the only possible way of development: literature can and should develop within the framework of Soviet ideology. The resolution of 1932 “On the restructuring of literary and artistic organizations” demonstrated to the literary community that RAPP did not have the capabilities of a “state administrative organization”. Only a party that can and should use literature as an ideological tool has such opportunities. The restructuring of literary organizations has changed the status of fiction, which overnight became “Soviet”. The first All-Union Congress of Soviet Writers in 1934 finally consolidated the concept of “Soviet” for the country’s fiction, which made it the bearer of party ideology. The prerequisites for such strict guardianship of the state are connected with the peculiarities of the historical development of the Bolshevik Party, the nature of which was the suppression of dissent. An analysis of the development of relations between the party leadership and literary organizations in the USSR during the period under study indicates that the actions of the party in its desire to control are associated with the desire to turn literature into an ideal propaganda tool. |
Keywords |
Proletarian Literature, Soviet Literature, Resolutions of the Central Committee of the CPSU (b), Proletkult, VAPP, RAPP, Organizing Committee of Soviet Writers, I All-Union Congress of Soviet Writers |
Reference |
1 Arias-Vikhil’, M.A. “Ob istorii sozdaniia termina “sotsialisticheskii realism” i podgotovka Pervogo s’ezda sovetskikh pisatelei” [“On the History of Creation of the Term “Socialist Realism” and Preparation of the First Congress of Soviet Writers”]. Codex Manuscriptus: Stat’i i arhivnye publikacii [Codex Manuscriptus: Papers and archive publications], vol. 1. Moscow, IWL RAS Publ., 2019, pp. 66–114. (In Russ.) 2 Bystrova, O.V. ‘‘Vliianie M. Gor’kogo na razvitie natsional’nykh literature” [“The Influence of M. Gorky on the Development of National Literatures”]. Filologicheskij klass, no. 2 (52), 2018, pp. 76–82. (In Russ.) 3 Gorbunov, V.V. V.I. Lenin i Proletkul’t [V.I. Lenin and the Proletcult]. Moscow, Politizdat Publ., 1974. 237 p. (In Russ.) 4 Kolmakov, A.V. “Dokumenty 20–30‑kh gg. XX veka: Istoriia poraboshcheniia sovetskoi literatury” [“Documents of the 20–30s of the 20th Century: The History of the Enslavement of Soviet Literature”]. Filologicheskii sklad, no. 17, 2007, pp. 61–64. (In Russ.) 5 Levchenko, M.A. Industrial’naia svirel’: Poeziia Proletkul’ta 1917–1921 gg. [ The Industrial Pipe: The Poetry of the Proletariat 1917–1921]. St. Petersburg, Saint Petersburg State University of Industrial Technologies and Design Publ., 2007. 141 p. (In Russ.) 6 Malygina, N.M. Andrei Platonov: Poetika “vozvrashcheniia” [Andrey Platonov: The Poetics of ‘Return”]. Moscow, TEIS Publ., 2005. 334 p. (In Russ.) 7 Men’shutin, A.N., Siniavskii A.D. Poeziia pervykh let revoliutsii. 1917‒1920 [Poetry of the First Years of the Revolution. 1917‒1920] Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1964. 422 p. (In Russ.) 8 Moskovskaia, D.S. “Proletarskaia literatura kak proekt” [“Proletarian Literature as a Project”]. Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie, no. 5 (171), 2021, pp. 80–93. (In Russ.) 9 Simmons, E. Dzh. “Politicheskii kontrol’ i sovetskaia literature” [“Political Control and Soviet Literature”]. Politicheskaya lingvistika, no. 1 (24), 2008, pp. 156‑163. (In Russ.) |
PDF-file |